[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080922184311.GI12483@merfinllc.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:43:11 -0700
From: Aaron Straus <aaron@...finllc.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@...la.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NFS] blocks of zeros (NULLs) in NFS files in kernels >= 2.6.20
Hi,
On Sep 22 10:45 AM, Aaron Straus wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> > index 3229e21..eb6b211 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> > @@ -1428,7 +1428,8 @@ static int nfs_write_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, int how)
> > .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
> > .nr_to_write = LONG_MAX,
> > .for_writepages = 1,
> > - .range_cyclic = 1,
> > + .range_start = 0,
> > + .range_end = LLONG_MAX,
> > };
> > int ret;
> >
>
> Also, I should test this, but I thought the VM was calling
> nfs_writepages directly i.e. not going through nfs_write_mapping. Let
> me test with this patch.
Yes. This patch doesn't seem to help. The VM is calling nfs_writepages
directly. I have debug statements in the nfs_write_mapping() call and it
hasn't been called when the hole appears.
It's the VM dirty page writeout that is happening out of order, *not*
nfs_wb_* stuff. That's why we can see it so easily. The dirty pages
are only scanned periodically. In-between scans is when we see the
hole.
I think :). I'm obviously not an expert here.
Thanks,
=a=
--
===================
Aaron Straus
aaron@...finllc.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists