[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21d7e9970809212359y6876c405ub57dca3e9ee737e4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:59:51 +1000
From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, chrisl@...are.com,
david.vrabel@....com
Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:51 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:54:13 +0200 (CEST)
>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11382
>> Subject : e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
>> Submitter : David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
>> Date : 2008-08-08 10:47 (45 days old)
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121819267211679&w=4
>> Handled-By : Christopher Li <chrisl@...are.com>
>
> Fixed by:
>
> commit 78566fecbb12a7616ae9a88b2ffbc8062c4a89e3
> Author: Christopher Li <chrisl@...are.com>
> Date: Fri Sep 5 14:04:05 2008 -0700
>
> e1000: prevent corruption of EEPROM/NVM
>
> Andrey reports e1000 corruption, and that a patch in vmware's ESX fixed
> it.
>
> The EEPROM corruption is triggered by concurrent access of the EEPROM
> read/write. Putting a lock around it solve the problem.
>
Just noticed I replied to davem and not to everyone.. so I did some
further hunting.
Okay so e1000e seems to have a problem in this area, that this *DOESN'T* fix.
I've reconstructed my boot timeline from message logs
Sep 3rd, I booted rawhide kernel 2.6.27-0.290.rc5.fc10.i686
I suspended/resume a few times in between with no issues.
Sep 8th I booted my own 2.6.27-rc5 kernel based from
ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346
This got a corrupted e1000e checksum and every kernel since has.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists