[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D8B6ED.6020407@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:29:17 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: petkovbb@...il.com, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
Mark de Wever <koraq@...all.nl>,
Gadi Oxman <gadio@...vision.net.il>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE-TAPE NULL terminate strings.
Hello.
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> Only not sure whether the static is the best solution, the following
>>> patch also works, by zeroing the memory as you suggested.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark de Wever <koraq@...all.nl>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
>>> index 1bce84b..c41f5b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
>>> @@ -2338,7 +2338,7 @@ static void idetape_get_inquiry_results(ide_drive_t *drive)
>>> {
>>> idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data;
>>> struct ide_atapi_pc pc;
>>> - char fw_rev[6], vendor_id[10], product_id[18];
>>> + char fw_rev[6] = {'\0'}, vendor_id[10] = {'\0'}, product_id[18] = {'\0'};
>>>
>>>
>> Do you realize how much *absolutely unnecessary* code will this bring
>> in? This is certainly worse than your initial patch (if it was correct).
>>
>
> Yep, Sergei's right. Both of our patches are dumb.
>
>
>> Ugh, looks like I'll have t submit the patch myself to stop this ugliness...
>>
>
> Is this what you had in mind?
>
Sure.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists