| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ed7dcf450809230236v762e0aa3v8748c76a64121f0c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:36:06 +0200 From: "Søren Hauberg" <hauberg@...il.com> To: "Ondrej Zary" <linux@...nbow-software.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbtouchscreen, 2.6.25 2008/9/23 Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>: > Calibration is a per-device thing. You can have more than one touchscreen (the > swap_xy feature is also wrong, but better than nothing). Yes, this is true. I'm going to claim (and I have no factual evidence to back this claim, I'm just making it up) that almost all touchscreen users only have one touchscreen. So, I'd rather have something that works for most users, then the current situation. Is it optimal? No! Is it practical? I believe so. Using your words, it's "better than nothing". Søren >> Søren >> >> P.S. I'm not subscribed to the list so please keep me in the CC. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists