linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Add UV bios call infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080923110711.GD29021@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:07:11 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, Huang@...e.hu,
	Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Add UV bios call infrastructure


* Russ Anderson <rja@....com> wrote:

> +/*
> + * IF EFI is not configured, have the EFI calls return unimplemented.
> + */
> +u64 efi_call6(void *fp, u64 arg1, u64 arg2, u64 arg3,
> +			u64 arg4, u64 arg5, u64 arg6)
> +{
> +	return  BIOS_STATUS_UNIMPLEMENTED;
> +}

> +#ifndef CONFIG_EFI
> +extern u64 efi_call6(void *, u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, u64);
> +#endif

shouldnt this be done in include/asm-x86/efi.h and 
arch/x86/kernel/efi_stub_64.S instead?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/