linux-kernel - Re: [GIT-PULL] Split time.c series: part 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:19:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT-PULL] Split time.c series: part 1


* Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote:

> Ingo, please pull the latest master branch git tree from:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/linux-2.6-x86-integration.git ingo-time
> 
> into your tree

hm, there's no ingo-time branch there. Forgot to push out? But the 
'master' branch seems to match up with your diffstat, so i pulled that 
one instead.

> It contains the part of time.c integration that is considered mostly 
> safe, and does not touch (but one reorganization patch) the interrupt 
> code. It should go smootly, but it's (should be) bisection friendly in 
> case it doesn't.

i've restructured the dependencies a bit: i've put your changes into 
tip/x86/time and based them on tip/x86/core (not tip/master). It 
integrates cleanly into tip/master and i've started testing them.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/