[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080923115045.GI10950@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:50:45 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext4: Use preallocation when reading from the inode
table
On Sep 23, 2008 10:16 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:35:23 -0400
> "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> > With modern hard drives, reading 64k takes roughly the same time as
> > reading a 4k block. So request adjacent inode table blocks to reduce
> > the time it takes when iterating over directories (especially when doing
> > this in htree sort order) in a cold cache case. With this patch, the
> > time it takes to run "git status" on a kernel tree after flushing the
> > caches via "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches", is reduced by 21%.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
>
> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
>
> I'm actually suprised that 16 is the magic tuning number you've used and
> a bigger one isn't even more of a win
I was going to suggest making this at least a #defined constant instead
of hard coding the values there. Making it a mount option and/or /proc
value would allow further testing.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists