[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809231552.41464.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:52:40 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@...litt.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
On Tuesday, 23 of September 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> > Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
>
> The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
> nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
> alive to chase the other issues.
Well, for the sake of documentation I'd prefer to close this bug and create a
new non-regression one for the other issues if that's not a problem.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists