linux-kernel - Re: sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48D8FC1E.6000601@bull.net>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:24:30 +0200
From:	Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet

Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 04:31:32PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Someone made me notice that Eric's "sysfs tagged directories" patchset
>> you merged recently  isn't complete in your "patches" tree. The last two
>> patches that actually uses this new feature aren't in your tree yet.
>>
>> * [PATCH 7/8] netns: Enable tagging for net_class directories in sysfs
>> * [PATCH 8/8] sysfs: user namespaces: fix bug with clone(CLONE_NEWUSER)	
>> with fairsched
>>
>> I didn't noticed it sooner because I'm still using my own version of the
>> patchset on top of linux-2.6.
>>
>> I'm wondering why you left these two patches out? Is it on purpose? Do
>> you expect other maintainers to merged them in their respective tree?
>> Dave Miller acked the patch for network namespace and said "You can send
>> it all through Greg or whoever, don't feel obligated to push it through
>> me since it depends upon the earlier bits in this series".
> 
> I only got so far through the patch set and then got interrupted (was at
> different conferences for 2 weeks), sorry.  I'll get the rest of the
> patchset added later today.
> 
> Note, I did talk to Al Viro about these patches last week at the kernel
> summit, and he advised holding off on sending them to mainline before he
> could review them.  So I'll keep them in my tree for now, but not push
> them to Linus until he acks them as he raised a few issues in our
> conversation.

Oh.
It's a pity Al couldn't re-review them before. We've already lost a lot
of time with this patchset and it's blocking easier testing of network
namespaces (right now, with a mainline kernel, we have to disable sysfs
to build network namespaces).

Eric sent the first version at the end of last year, then I've sent it 6
times between April and July to keep it alive, and finally Eric reworked
the patchset in July and sent a couple of versions to address the issues
Tejun Heo had formulated. It would have been great to receive all the
feedback at that time.

But, I know, we all are busy men and we all have our priorities, and
it takes time to get the things done right and then merged.
I have to learn patience. :)

Thanks anyway. It's a good step to have it in a tree.

Benjamin

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> 


-- 
B e n j a m i n   T h e r y  - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D

    http://www.bull.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/