[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48D94BA8.9030106@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:03:52 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, darren@...art.com,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Unified tracing buffer
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state3/usage
>> 171210
>
> C3 stops the TSC. So depending on how many C3 entries you have on the
> different cores, your TSCs will drift apart. Some BIOSes do even a
> lousy job trying to fixup the TSCs on exit from C3, which makes things
> even worse.
>
>> C1: type[C1] promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[001] usage[00000016] duration[00000000000000000000]
>> C2: type[C2] promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[001] usage[00037969] duration[00000000000024288003]
>> C3: type[C3] promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[057] usage[00171818] duration[00000000001881257636]
>>
>> Could these help you?
>
> Yup, explains your TSC observation. Nothing we can do about. Broken by
> system design :( Welcome in the wonderful world of Inhell/BIOS/ACPI !
Thank you for analyzing! :-)
Hmm, then could I fix that by fixing my dsdt...?
Thanks again,
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists