[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080923150129.0d8356e8@bike.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:01:29 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, safford@...son.ibm.com,
debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4][resubmit] TPM: rcu locking
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:19:33 -0300
Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Protects tpm_chip_list when transversing it.
It all looks like it should work (though it might make sense to include
<linux/rcupdate.h> and <linux/rculist.h>. But I have to ask: do you
really need the added complexity of RCU here? I suspect that TPM
devices don't come and go very often...once most of us have ripped it
out, we tend to leave it out...:)
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists