| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080923.150722.141587696.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: airlied@...il.com Cc: jkosina@...e.cz, david.vrabel@....com, rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, chrisl@...are.com Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:09:09 +1000 > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:05 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> > > Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:29:16 +0200 (CEST) > > > >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> > >> > So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 > >> > ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were > >> > definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > >> > >> Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > >> into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > > > My current suspicion in all of this is either the GEM kernel patches > > or recent X server. > > > > I don't think OpenSUSE was shipping any of the GEM bits. Good data point, can someone confirm this? Also, what X server version is the effected OpenSUSE shipping? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists