[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0809231610530.25628@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:48:37 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] file capabilities: add no_file_caps switch (v2)
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > I agree. These other behaviorial changes should not depend on
> > CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES; the old behavior should just be fixed
> > instead.
>
> That of course would be the point of the patch 3/3, which removes
> CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES as a config option.
btw, don't make it Y at all (patch 1/3 ?), as Linus has outlawed making
new features default to Y.
> Should I do that when I redo the patch as per Stephen's suggestion to
> use filecaps=0/1?
Given that there's existing use of no_file_caps, and that I doubt Fedora
will provide an install option to disable it, probably just stick with
no_file_caps.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists