| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48D89E0C.9040407@bigtelecom.ru> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:43:08 +0400 From: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru> To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> CC: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Machine Check Exception Re: NetDev! Please help! Hello I stop eth1 and eth0 and run "emegre portage" and get exception. Now i think its not problem in network part. I miss situation in 2.6.27 about multiqueue and traffic shaper because i was have many work and was can't read all netdev list =( As i understand 2.6.27-rc have support multiqueue, but how it will work with HTB/SFQ? Is tc rules must have in 2.6.27 one root queue (and all queue go to this tree) or need to do many qdiscs and settings it to device queues (i was read some about queue2band)? If it is simple for you - can you sort describe this part of changes? P.S. I think now that problem not in network part of kernel and i think i stop CC netdev and Denys Fedoryshchenko. Thanks for you doing and thanks for help! Thanks. > Actually, it's quite well tested, especially by Denys, and I doubt it > will be much better in 2.6.27. BTW, maybe start eth1, stop eth0 yet? > > Thanks, > Jarek P. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists