[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080923081650.GA19003@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:16:50 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86: fix macro with bad_bios_dmi_table
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> need one blank tail.
>
> fix the crash on ingo's test box.
applied to tip/x86/memory-corruption-check, thanks Yinghai!
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -760,8 +760,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata bad_bios_dmi_table[] = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "Phoenix Technologies, LTD"),
> },
> },
> - {}
> #endif
> + {}
> };
i've seen such DMI crashes numerous times, caused by a missing NULL at
the end of the table. Is there no sane way to detect or robustly avoid
such run-off-the-end bugs?
how about changing dmi_check_system(table) to a macro, which does
something like:
__dmi_check_system(&(table), sizeof(table))
and rename dmi_check_system() in drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c to
__dmi_check_system() and add the size parameter? That way we could
remove the need for NULL termination and it's even a size optimization:
it shrinks those tables a tiny bit.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists