[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DA6887.1060709@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:19:19 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yan Li <elliot.li.tech@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
joerg.roedel@....com, rjmaomao@...il.com,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, nancydreaming@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMware guest detection for x86 and x86-64
Yan Li wrote:
> Detects whether we are running as a VMware guest or not. Detection is
> based upon DMI vendor string.
>
> It provides a function:
> int is_vmware_guest(void)
> that can be used easily to detect if we are running as a VMware guest
> or not.
>
> I haven't used PCI vendor Id since that requires copying a trunk of
> codes from early_quirks() and I think copying code is not good. And
> reusing codes from early_quirks() needs intrivial change to present
> codes structure. Comparatively, checking "VMware" string against DMI
> manufacturer is a lot more simpler (one-line code). Also there's no
> evidence indicating that VMware will change their vendor string in
> near future. Therefore I choose to use simpler way.
>
> Tested on x86 and x86-64 VMs and machines.
I'd like to make this a general VM platform detection subsystem. We
have similar issues with Virtual PC, and again, DMI appears to be the
sanest way to detect it -- at least to a primary screen.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists