[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080924092040.d8407311.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:20:40 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: sqazi@...gle.com (Salman Qazi), linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mlock: Make the mlock system call interruptible by fatal
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:22:55 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > > Can we do
> > >
> > > return i ? i : -EINTR;
> > >
> > > in the usual fashion?
> >
> > Fixed.
>
> If its only interruptible by fatal signals why do we care what the return
> is ?
>
For the immediate in-kernel caller. __get_user_pages() took a ref on a
few pages which the caller needs to undo before doing anything else
(like processing the signal).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists