[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080924175358.GA2591@phobos.i.cabal.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:53:58 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, mingo@...e.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] e1000e: Useset_memory_ro()/set_memory_rw() to
protect flash memory
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:45:54PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> +#ifdef _ASM_X86_CACHEFLUSH_H
> + set_memory_rw((unsigned long)hw->flash_address,
> + hw->flash_len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +#endif
> writew(val, hw->flash_address + reg);
> +#ifdef _ASM_X86_CACHEFLUSH_H
> + set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hw->flash_address,
> + hw->flash_len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +#endif
> }
Hi Jeff,
You're making the entire read-only mapping read-write for the single
writel call... why not just limit it to the page that the writel is
targetting?
regards, Kyle
[sorry, I've only been following this at a glance, but it's somewhat
important for rawhide... does someone have a way to reproduce this at
whim? Has someone tried catching it using an IOMMU on one of the newer
Intel boxes, if it is a DMA going awry?]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists