[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DA8DC4.90203@ct.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:58:12 -0700
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, macro@...ux-mips.org, yhlu.kernel@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] x86: apic - simplify lapic_get_maxlvt
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Lets use lapic_get_version helper and hide
> register being read. Also it allow us to
> make code a bit tighter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic.c 2008-09-24 19:17:20.000000000 +0400
> +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/apic.c 2008-09-24 19:33:31.000000000 +0400
> @@ -309,14 +309,14 @@ int get_physical_broadcast(void)
> */
> int lapic_get_maxlvt(void)
> {
> - unsigned int v;
> + unsigned int ver;
>
> - v = apic_read(APIC_LVR);
> + ver = lapic_get_version();
> /*
> * - we always have APIC integrated on 64bit mode
> * - 82489DXs do not report # of LVT entries
> */
> - return APIC_INTEGRATED(GET_APIC_VERSION(v)) ? GET_APIC_MAXLVT(v) : 2;
> + return APIC_INTEGRATED(ver) ? GET_APIC_MAXLVT(ver) : 2;
^^^
Hi, is this correct?
Does ver have the full content of apic_read(APIC_LVR)?
thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists