[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222283477.4425.55.camel@calx>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:11:17 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:56 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason I shouldn't use truncate() in regular shmem.c if I
> > were to unify the two files?
>
> It would be nice to keep tiny-shmem.c, well, tiny for NOMMU systems that can't
> have swap and can't have virtual memory. Note that regular shmem does not now
> build on top of ramfs, so you'd have to port the ramfs internals to it.
As the original author of tiny-shmem.c, I will naturally try to bear
this in mind. The goal would be to build both a regular and a tiny
version from one C file so that they won't diverge again in the future.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists