[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222228215.7761.0.camel@charm-linux>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:50:15 -0500
From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...cast.net>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, od@...e.com,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hch@....de,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Unified tracing buffer
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 07:00 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> > - get rid of anything having to do with padding, nobody needs it and its
> > only affect has been to horribly distort and complicate a lot of the
> > code
> > - get rid of sub-buffers, they just cause confusion
> > - get rid of mmap, nobody uses it
> > - no sub-buffers and no mmap support means we can get rid of most of the
> > callbacks, and a lot of API confusion along with them
> > - add relay flags - they probably should have been used from the
> > beginning and options made explicit instead of being shoehorned into the
> > callback functions.
>
> Actually, I think if you did all that, it'd be pretty close to what we
> want anyway ...
OK, then, I'll continue with the cleanup patchset and see where it
goes...
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists