linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:42:42 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
Cc:	dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	jeremy@...p.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart

Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@...columbia.edu):
> These patches implement basic checkpoint-restart [CR]. This version (v5)
> supports basic tasks with simple private memory, and open files (regular
> files and directories only). The main changes include rework of memory
> restart code and response to feedback. See original announcements below.
> 
> Oren.

Playing around a bit, all seems to work as advertised.

Has anyone playing with this run into any oopses with the latest
version?

Cedric, could you send out your patch (or a pointer to them) to make
ckpt/restart on another task work, so we can pound the core code a bit
harder with liblxc?

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/