linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/12] memcg optimize percpu stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080925151823.62bf6bd6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:18:23 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH 6/12] memcg optimize percpu stat

Some obvious optimization to memcg.

I found mem_cgroup_charge_statistics() is a little big (in object) and
does unnecessary address calclation.
This patch is for optimization to reduce the size of this function.

And res_counter_charge() is 'likely' to success.

Changelog v3->v4:
 - merged with an other leaf patch.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

 mm/memcontrol.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.27-rc7+/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -66,11 +66,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup_stat {
 /*
  * For accounting under irq disable, no need for increment preempt count.
  */
-static void __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat,
+static inline void __mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu *stat,
 		enum mem_cgroup_stat_index idx, int val)
 {
-	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	stat->cpustat[cpu].count[idx] += val;
+	stat->count[idx] += val;
 }
 
 static s64 mem_cgroup_read_stat(struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat,
@@ -237,18 +236,21 @@ static void mem_cgroup_charge_statistics
 {
 	int val = (charge)? 1 : -1;
 	struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat = &mem->stat;
+	struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu *cpustat;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
+	cpustat = &stat->cpustat[smp_processor_id()];
 	if (PageCgroupCache(pc))
-		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(stat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE, val);
+		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE, val);
 	else
-		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(stat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS, val);
+		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS, val);
 
 	if (charge)
-		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(stat,
+		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat,
 				MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGIN_COUNT, 1);
 	else
-		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(stat,
+		__mem_cgroup_stat_add_safe(cpustat,
 				MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT, 1);
 }
 
@@ -609,7 +611,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_charge_common(stru
 		css_get(&memcg->css);
 	}
 
-	while (res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+	while (unlikely(res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE))) {
 		if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT))
 			goto out;
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/