[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080925094231.442a4c75@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:42:31 +0200
From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
To: benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <RAISCH@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with
hardirq preemption
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:22:41 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 09:18 +0200, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, that's the right approach then. It should work. I don't know
> > what
> > > the specific problems with HEA are at this stage.
> >
> > Yep, except as it behaves in way that the current -rt fasteoi flow
> > cannot handle.
>
> We probably need to make a special xics flow handler for -rt that does
> what Milton suggested, ie, bring down the CPU priority right away
Do you mean creating a custom fasteoi handler into xics.c? Also, it's
not clear to me from looking at the code how you go about changing the
cpu priority.
> and
> only EOI later or something like that, instead of masking/unmasking.
>
> I don't know what are the other potential issues with the HEA though.
Don't know either, but that I can test.
Thanks,
Sebastien.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists