linux-kernel - [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48DB81BA.2050204@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:19:06 +0100
From:	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Subject: [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output

Hi!

I tried to figure out the origin of the bug reported by Pekka Paalanen
about the broken pipe:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/15/3305224

When I add a trace_mark with the boot tracer, I had this same problem
but this time it was easy to reproduce.

When it calls a tracer's print_line callback, the print_trace_line function 
in trace.c returns whithout verifying if it could handle the entry properly.
And actually the seq could be empty.

For example the boot_tracer don't handle TRACE_PRINT. Nevertheless it
wants them to be printed as a default way.

So print_trace_line function should relay on the other functions which could handle
an output if one of them fail.

Reported-by: Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---

View attachment "1.diff" of type "text/plain" (1017 bytes)