[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809250336.27647.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:36:27 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] file capabilities: remove CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES
On Thursday, 25 September 2008 3:02:33 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wright (chrisw@...s-sol.org):
> > What is being done to enable userspace in distros to make those 570
> > bytes generally useful?
>
> Fedora 9 and ubuntu intrepid already have full capabilities support and
> modern libcap. Sles is set to ship with a modern libcap, and according
> to what Andreas is saying, if we can provide them with the no_file_caps
> boot option then suse is willing to have a kernel with capabilities
> turned on.
Yes.
> I think gentoo still comes with libcap-1. Need to look into
> changing that.
>
> I suppose the next baby-step will be to do get rid of setuid on little
> things like ping.
Real file capability support in RPM seems important to me; hacking this
into %post scripts is not a reasonable approach.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists