[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080925133645.GB13414@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:36:45 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
serue@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
safford@...son.ibm.com, debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] TPM: rcu locking
Quoting Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com):
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:18:17PM -0300, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:19 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > But here we are deleting from what appears to be some other list.
> > > And I don't see any insertiong into either list.
> > >
> > > What am I missing here?
> > >
> > > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > Sorry, forgot to change list_add() to list_add_rcu() in the code section
> > below:
> >
> > > > + /* Make chip available */
> > > > + spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> > > > + list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
> > > > + spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> >
> > I'll resubmit.
>
> Cool!
>
> So tpm_chip_list and the not-obviously-identical list manipulated
> in tpm_remove_hardware() really are the same list?
>
> Thanx, Paul
Hey Paul,
curious, why do they not look like the same list?
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists