[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080925141809.GB6725@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:18:09 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, manfred@...orfullife.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schamp@....com,
niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, andi@...stfloor.org, tglx@...utronix.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] v6 scalable classic RCU implementation
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:29:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Attached is an updated patch to Classic RCU that applies a hierarchy,
> > greatly reducing the contention on the top-level lock for large
> > machines. This passes 10-hour concurrent rcutorture and
> > online-offline testing on 128-CPU ppc64 without dynticks enabled, and
> > exposes some timekeeping bugs in presence of dynticks (exciting
> > working on a system where "sleep 1" hangs until interrupted...).
>
> i'm wondering about those timekeeping bugs. Do you have an idea what's
> it about and does it affect mainline?
Sad to say, they do affect mainline -- I can reproduce these problems
in 2.6.27-rc7. Thomas has given me a couple of fixes that got rid of
earlier problems in which jiffies would stop counting, and I believe
has located the cause of at least one other problem.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists