[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809250908.37676.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:08:36 -0700
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
airlied@...il.com, david.vrabel@....com, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
chrisl@...are.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, Karsten Keil <kkeil@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
On Wednesday, September 24, 2008 5:33 pm Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > That said, adding a check to the x86 code would be a good thing to do;
> > I'll hack up a patch tomorrow unless someone beats me to it.
>
> The problem here is that what we desperately need first is a method to
> restore the original EEPROM contents after it gets corrupted (David Airlie
> has, sadly, apparently bricked his notebook while trying to do so).
> Without this, we can put a lot of debugging/protecting patches into the
> kernel, but we won't be able to succesfully verify anything, because
> testing wouldn't be possible.
>
> Added Jesse and Karsten to CC, as they are working on such a tool right
> now, as far as I know.
I should be able to test the mmap fix independently of the e1000 breakage at
least... lemme try it out now...
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists