linux-kernel - Re: [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c62985530809250940s1cdab6dau87bee24b6bc6c089@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:40:53 +0200
From:	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Pekka Paalanen" <pq@....fi>
Cc:	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output

2008/9/25 Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>:
> Oh cool, sounds like I should try linux-next when I can.


It is on -tip if you want :)

So, unless someone is opposed to. I will send a patch which define
three possible values
for the print_line callback. I will define these values on trace.h
Why not:

#define TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE 0
#define TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED 1
#define TRACE_TYPE_UNHANDLED 2   => will relay on default functions

Hmm I'm questionning about the relevance of this kind of patch since
the tracing API is in refactoring...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/