[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809251921340.18801@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:24:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, airlied@...il.com,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, david.vrabel@....com, rjw@...k.pl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
chrisl@...are.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, jesse.brandeburg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Extra datapoint. As far as I've seen this problem has not yet been
> reported by any people running Debian. This could point to X.Org as
> Debian currently has 7.3 while I think the reports so far have been with
> 7.4.
Yes, I think that xorg/xorg i915 driver/libdrm/GEM/whatever are the
biggest suspect currently, according to the data that has been gathered so
far.
Still, what confuses me a little bit -- the EEPROM of the card is set to
all 0xff, once the corruption happens. Isn't that a quite a coincidence,
that bytes representing "nothing" in this context are used?
If being set to 0 (it's so easy to call memset(0) on a bogus pointer,
there are usually lots of them in the code) or to random garbage, it would
seem to be much more understandable, than 0xff.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists