linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fsl-dma: allow Freescale Elo DMA driver to be compiled as a module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48DBDFC7.1060907@freescale.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:00:23 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
CC:	Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsl-dma: allow Freescale Elo DMA driver to be compiled
 as a module

Timur Tabi wrote:
> There are no dependencies.  fsldma registers with the DMA engine,
> which is always built in-kernel.  The DMA engine is what handles
> linking DMA clients to DMA drivers. The DMA clients get a callback
> whenever a DMA driver registers with the DMA engine.  If the DMA
> driver is already registered when the client registers, then the
> client will get a callback immediately after it registers.
> 
> I chose subsys_initcall() to increase the probability that fsldma is
> already present when DMA clients are loaded/initialized and register.

If there's no dependency, why does it matter whether fsldma is already 
present?

-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/