[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DC0859.8010103@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:53:29 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: v2.6.27-rc7: x86: #GP on panic?
Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>> Seems like an external interrupt happened and was delivered after the sti?
>>>
>>> Hm. I guess it smells like a qemu bug since it's rather easily
>>> reproducible here and sounds strange that nobody else saw it. Is qemu
>>> 0.9.1.
>>>
>> Yes, but there shouldn't be any external interrupts that could turn into a
>> divide error. It really smells like a Qemu problem -- possibly even a Qemu
>> miscompile -- to me.
>>
>> Does it reproduce in KVM?
>
> I have no computer that can do KVM, sorry :-(
>
> Stack trace contains IO_APIC functions, so it seems that maybe the
> emulated IOAPIC is trying to (erroneously) deliver an int 0 (for some
> reason)? But I don't know, that's just speculation which can be done
> better by others, so I will stop now :-)
>
I suspect it's a problem in Qemu's IOAPIC model, but it's hard to know
for sure.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists