[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DC18E9.7000007@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:04:09 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...cast.net>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> Firstly they need a low-frequency (10khz-100khz) shared clock line
>> across all CPUs. A single line - and since it's low frequency it could
>> be overlaid on some existing data line and filtered out. That works
>> across NUMA nodes as well and physics allows it to be nanosec accurate
>> up to dozens of meters or so.
>>
>
> Can this possibly be true? I mean, light travels only one foot every
> nanosecond. Can it really keep nanosecond accuracy up to dozens of meters
> away?
Sure. NTP keeps machines within 1ms (or better) of each other even
though the network latency is much higher and jittery.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists