[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DB1984.8020704@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:54:28 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: akataria@...are.com
CC: Alok kataria <alokkataria1@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Yan Li <elliot.li.tech@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"joerg.roedel@....com" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
"rjmaomao@...il.com" <rjmaomao@...il.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>, Zach Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMware detection support for x86 and x86-64
Alok Kataria wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:38 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Alok kataria wrote:
>>> Even if there is anything on that port on native hardware it would
>>> work perfectly well and is _safe_.
>>> First let me post the code to access this backdoor port (the way it
>>> should really be done )
>>>
>>> So whenever we query port 0x5658 , with the GETVERSION command (which
>>> is the first thing we do with this port), we expect that eax !=
>>> 0xFFFFFFFF and ebx has a VMWARE specific MAGIC value. Please note
>>> that ebx has been initialized to zero in the code above.
>>>
>> You have no idea what you just did to a real piece of hardware.
> Why ? what do you mean ?
> ebx is a local variable in the code above that i posted.
> Only when on hypervisor will we write the magic value over there.
> How can this affect native hardware, i fail to understand.
> Please explain.
>
You accessed a bloody I/O port!
If you think it's harmless because it was an IN, you're sorely mistaken.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists