[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222412784.5825.6.camel@zwerg>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:06:24 +0200
From: Alexey Rempel <fishor@....net>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
davem@...emloft.net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
david.vrabel@....com, rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, chrisl@...are.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11382] e1000e: 2.6.27-rc1 corrupts EEPROM/NVM
On Fr, 2008-09-26 at 00:45 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > >> I'd target three areas PAT, pciaccess and e1000e itself.
> > > ubuntu has CONFIG_X86_PAT disabled for at least i386 arch, maybe that
> > > is relevant.
> > It rules out PAT I suppose, they have seen the issue as well.
>
> I wasn't able to rule out PAT from the suse bugreports POV, as we have PAT
> enabled both for 32bit and 64bit x86.
>
> If Ubuntu has it disabled also for 64bit x86 (where do these guys have
> .config files to check?), I think we can definitely rule out PAT, as there
> has been at least one report from Ubuntu user on this very issue.
>
I'm testing ubuntu intrepid also "afected system" but not affected card
and use e1000e driver. (i945g+ich7)
as i can see ubuntu at least now do not use pat on 32bit system.
config is attached.
View attachment "config-2.6.27-4-generic" of type "text/plain" (95911 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists