[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DC9EF2.10004@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:06:02 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/12] memcg move charege() call to swapped-in page under
lock_page()
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> While page-cache's charge/uncharge is done under page_lock(), swap-cache
> isn't. (anonymous page is charged when it's newly allocated.)
>
> This patch moves do_swap_page()'s charge() call under lock. This helps
> us to avoid to charge already mapped one, unnecessary calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Seems reasonable to me
Just one quick comment though, as a result of this change, mark_page_accessed is
now called with PageLock held, I suspect you would want to move that call prior
to lock_page().
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists