[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DCAFC4.40009@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:17:48 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"xemul@...nvz.org" <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>, ryov@...inux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/12] memcg make page->mapping NULL before calling uncharge
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> This patch tries to make page->mapping to be NULL before
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page() is called.
>
> "page->mapping == NULL" is a good check for "whether the page is still
> radix-tree or not".
> This patch also adds BUG_ON() to mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page();
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Looks good, small nit-pick below
> #endif
> ClearPagePrivate(page);
> set_page_private(page, 0);
> - page->mapping = NULL;
> + /* page->mapping contains a flag for PageAnon() */
> + if (PageAnon(page)) {
> + /* This page is uncharged at try_to_unmap(). */
> + page->mapping = NULL;
> + } else {
> + /* Obsolete file cache should be uncharged */
> + page->mapping = NULL;
> + mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
> + }
>
Isn't it better and correct coding style to do
/*
* Uncharge obsolete file cache
*/
if (!PageAnon(page))
mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
/* else - uncharged at try_to_unmap() */
page->mapping = NULL;
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists