[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222430455-4632-6-git-send-email-swhiteho@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:00:48 +0100
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] GFS2: Fix race relating to glock min-hold time
In the case that a request for a glock arrives right after the
grant reply has arrived, it sometimes means that the gl_tstamp
field hasn't been updated recently enough. The net result is that
the min-hold time for the glock is ignored. If this happens
often enough, it leads to poor performance.
This patch adds an additional test, so that if the reply pending
bit is set on a glock, then it will select the maximum length of
time for the min-hold time, rather than looking at gl_tstamp.
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index 4cbb695..806e1eb 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -1265,6 +1265,8 @@ static void blocking_cb(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct lm_lockname *name,
holdtime = gl->gl_tchange + gl->gl_ops->go_min_hold_time;
if (time_before(now, holdtime))
delay = holdtime - now;
+ if (test_bit(GLF_REPLY_PENDING, &gl->gl_flags))
+ delay = gl->gl_ops->go_min_hold_time;
spin_lock(&gl->gl_spin);
handle_callback(gl, state, 1, delay);
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists