[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222446056.3971.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:20:56 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Kai Makisara <Kai.Makisara@...umbus.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH git latest] drivers/scsi: fixing wrong comment before
new_buffer_tape()
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 17:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Looks true to me for the current versions of the code. In fact it is only
> > > ever called from the initialisation function that I can see so chunks of
> > > the code could simply go away as well as bits of the comment. Ditto the
> > > one in drivers/scsi/st.c
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> > >
> >
> > I am sorry I didn't quite understand. You mean it is true that caller
> > must hold os_scsi_tapes_lock?
>
> Sorry - I mean what you claim is true - that the comment is incorrect.
So, I think I'm missing a piece of this: There's no patch in this
thread (I presume it's lurking somewhere on lkml). Could someone repost
the proposed patch and copy the tape maintainer: Kai Makisara
<Kai.Makisara@...umbus.fi> to get his input?
Thanks,
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists