linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMware detection support for x86 and x86-64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48DD1DE1.5070708@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:37:37 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC:	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
	Alok kataria <alokkataria1@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Yan Li <elliot.li.tech@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"joerg.roedel@....com" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
	"rjmaomao@...il.com" <rjmaomao@...il.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VMware detection support for x86 and x86-64

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> Which would be hardware implementers in the '80s getting wrong the first few
> times what IBM did right the first time.  Doesn't *anybody* do literature
> searches before doing stuff anymore? ;)

Well, yes.  There are some prety strong reasons to believe that Intel 
got that one wrong *deliberately*, until VMware finally forced their hand.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/