linux-kernel - Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1222453053.3949.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:17:33 +0100
From:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export.

On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 16:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> It's possible, the good case is naturally quite hard to establish with
> 100% certainty. I declared v2.6.26 OK after an uptime of 4 days and 19
> hours, compared with failure normally within 1-2 days. It's possible I
> was premature in doing so. I'll run 2e96d2867 for at least a full week
> before reporting back.

Or it'll reproduce after just a few hours :-/

Looks like a false negative on v2.6.26 -- I'll retest from there.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell

That secret you've been guarding, isn't.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)