[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DD2BA3.7050808@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:36:19 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging)
Parag Warudkar wrote:
> I have repeatedly said it is very easy to see from the
> module list for people to decide - not rocket science, definitely not
> for developers. The whole TAINT drama is unnecessary.
It _is_ necessary. I for one don't want to have to remember that driver
foobar was in "staging" state in kernel 2.6.31-rc5, but not anymore in
2.6.32-rc1.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--= ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists