[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33307c790809261246o47148443j49fee9197d18a3f1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:46:23 -0700
From: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"David Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:05 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> +struct buffer_page {
>> + u64 time_stamp;
>> + unsigned char body[];
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define BUF_PAGE_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(u64))
>
> Since you're already using the page frame, you can stick this per page
> timestamp in there as well, and get the full page for data.
>
> You can either use a struct page overlay like slob does, or add a u64 in
> the union that contains struct {private, mapping}.
What did you guys think of Mathieu's idea of sticking the buffer length
in the header here, rather than using padding events? Seemed cleaner
to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists