[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080926223129.GF15446@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:31:29 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer
Em Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:05:44PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> + */
> +static inline void *
> +ring_buffer_event_data(struct ring_buffer_event *event)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(event->type != RB_TYPE_DATA);
> + /* If length is in len field, then array[0] has the data */
> + if (event->len)
> + return (void *)&event->array[0];
> + /* Otherwise length is in array[0] and array[1] has the data */
> + return (void *)&event->array[1];
Nitpick: Why cast to void *?
And sometimes you use the rb_ prefix, in other cases you use the longer
for ring_buffer_, is the ring_ namespace already used? Or can we make it
use rb_ consistently to shorten the names?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists