[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DD662F.7080803@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:46:07 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging)
Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Stefan Richter
> <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Parag Warudkar wrote:
>>> Just name the staging modules with _stg prefix like I said - easier to
>>> spot _stg in the module list than decoding the taint.
>> ...
>>> It is nice to not have to change core kernel code and annoy users with
>>> warnings
>> Yes, let's annoy them with weird name changes instead.
>
> So people now a days crave for documenting staging modules and also
> get confused by the mixed use of driver_stg or driver? Come on.
>
> The name changes hardly matter for auto loading staging modules
I continue to believe that you don't work with users.
> and I would be surprised if people document crap modules especially since
> the stable ones are documented later if at all they end up being
> documented.
Many of the staging drivers are already in active use; one or another
even for years. Since they are not as easy to use as mainline drivers,
people discuss and document them.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--= ==-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists