linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809261957001.21618@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer


On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

> Em Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:05:44PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > + */
> > +static inline void *
> > +ring_buffer_event_data(struct ring_buffer_event *event)
> > +{
> > +	BUG_ON(event->type != RB_TYPE_DATA);
> > +	/* If length is in len field, then array[0] has the data */
> > +	if (event->len)
> > +		return (void *)&event->array[0];
> > +	/* Otherwise length is in array[0] and array[1] has the data */
> > +	return (void *)&event->array[1];
> 
> Nitpick: Why cast to void *?

5 day hacking marathon, I cast everything ;-)

> 
> And sometimes you use the rb_ prefix, in other cases you use the longer
> for ring_buffer_, is the ring_ namespace already used? Or can we make it
> use rb_ consistently to shorten the names?

I started using the rb_ because I was constantly breaking the 80 character 
line limit with ring_buffer ;-)   OK, for v8, I'll rename all static 
internal functions to rb_ and keep the global ones ring_buffer_

Thanks,

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/