linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809271335001.10534@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:38:15 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...cast.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer


On Sat, 27 Sep 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> If all you do is to trace high-freq events on all CPUs and you are _not_ 
> interested in the precise interactions, the overhead of global 
> synchronization can hurt a lot.
> 
> In any case, SMP coherency of trace events is an independent property of 
> the tracer, and preferably something that can be turned on/off.

Just a note.  The current ring buffering system that I'm proposing keeps 
its own time stamp counter (currently sched_clock) that will most likely 
be updated later. I'm trying to keep this ring buffer system as dumb as 
possible. It does not even implement the merge sort. That's up to the 
tracer to handle. There's nothing stopping the trace from adding some 
atomic counter to each event to help it sort.

So yes, the tracer can implement anything it wants on top of the ring 
buffer ;-)

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/