[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1222537829.16700.304.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:50:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...cast.net>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 13:38 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> It does not even implement the merge sort. That's up to the
> tracer to handle.
You could though, as you have the timestamps..
> So yes, the tracer can implement anything it wants on top of the ring
> buffer ;-)
Mathieu seems to disagree, it would be good if he can share some
specifics so we can work on resolving those.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists