[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080927181042.GD1108@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:10:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: trivial fix for incorrect comments
* Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com> wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -298,9 +298,9 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cfs_rq, init_cfs_rq) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_rt_entity, init_sched_rt_entity);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rt_rq, init_rt_rq) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> #endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
> -#else /* !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
> +#else /* !CONFIG_USER_SCHED */
> #define root_task_group init_task_group
> -#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_USER_SCHED */
hm, these seem to be fixed already, via:
| commit 9a7e0b180da21885988d47558671cf580279f9d6
| Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
| Date: Tue Aug 19 12:33:06 2008 +0200
|
| sched: rt-bandwidth fixes
is all in tip/master.
(or is perhaps the direction of your patch wrong?)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists